total war warhammer norsca mechanics chaos corruption

Total war warhammer norsca mechanics chaos corruption full#
Total war warhammer norsca mechanics chaos corruption free#

Those times where your lord vs an enemy lord just fart around and turn 90 degrees or whatever are happening because its trying to fire off matched animations and it isn't working right. I'm sure that's why the blood dlc isn't out yet. There are problems with the synchronized kill/attack moves in vanilla, and the blood DLC impacts those. I just want to know if there is anyone over there in that office who is like 'hey, fuckers! nobody moves right in these loving towns you all made.' That being said it's probably something stupid that's slowing it's release like the blood textures cause a massive FPS drop due to the way they interact with Ogre titties or something. Putting out the Blood DLC at this point of highly vocal/visible negativity would be a bad move especially if there's not a planned content drop afterwards for a hot minute due to development concerns. Yeah - that would be my call if I was overseeing the project tbh. The press release thingy on Steam got updated, apparently, which usually predicts some sort of content drop. Adding blood effects to new factions shouldn't be particularly difficult. It's slightly silly since the blood DLC is so established at this point, but I can't come up with an actual GOOD reason why it's not out.

Total war warhammer norsca mechanics chaos corruption free#

I've seen it suggested that blood DLC hasn't released because CA knows there are vocal groups critical of the DLC and believe releasing it before fixing things and putting out free content updates (whether IE or just some free lord pack or whatever) will result in fan backlash. The Norsca thing delayed their planned content by like 6 months iirc. It would be exceptionally embarrassing for a company to have to admit that they made the same major mistake twice like that, but it's practically unthinkable that they could have done that imo. I think someone speculated that they had done the same thing they did with WH2 where Norsca was made using WH1 coding and so couldn't be moved over to the new game without creating it all from the ground up again. If there was a big problem with the coding for WH3 you'd imagine that a modder would have noticed it by now.

It is odd that it hasn't been released yet. They've done it for every game they've released since Rome 2.

It should be trivial for them to release it. The blood DLC should be built into the game during development and only taken out during release for ratings purposes. Something or somethings went very badly wrong during development. It's still their biggest series.Ĭause they hosed the whole development up somehow. Just based on how well WH2 did, I don't see 3 getting canned or even pared down. The Chad Jihad fucked around with this message at 13:05 on Apr 22, 2022 Like I'm a RotK player so the same map over and over with different starting makeups is right up my alley but it's not all that exciting on it's own to most people I think

I'm not sure how well the Nanman did, but aside from a possible northern expansion that was the only Warhammer race pack esque exciting content they could have dropped so I'm guessing that's why they stopped progressing the timeline.Īnd yeah it was admirable that they overall tried to make it so that new mechanics weren't locked into a specific start date but that also made getting most DLC's on release not all that compelling The first big DLCs for 3k (8 princes and mandate of heaven) sold like gangbusters, it's when they went into the various extra startdates that things dipped. I do think they'll go back to the warhammer well eventually, but it'll take a big leap in various areas to justify going from the medley of factions right now back to fourish when they restart.ĬA would be crazy not to run the easy bet into the ground before trying their hand at another fantasy setting with less clear prospects. Whereas TW3 has no clear sequel prospects for the time being. As it is now, I fail to see why they made refusing Chaos offer such measly buffs that you don't even get until killing Chaos off (at which point the campaign will basically be in the bag anyways).And when they discontinued it they announced that they were doing it so they could make a sequel. Personally, I'd like to see some substantial and immediate buffs for refusing Chaos, so that there's at least some level of thought that goes into deciding what to do. But for actual strategy, there simply is no reason to refuse them. If you want a challenge, or just want to have fun opposing Chaos for lore reasons or role-play or whatever, then I can see refusing Chaos.

Total war warhammer norsca mechanics chaos corruption full#

* A bunch of friendly, full Chaos stacks you can direct onto the last settlements you need to destroy.

* +5 happiness for all your un-wall-able settlements that probably need the happiness would you like a few meager buffs that are delayed until you kill a new super-charged enemy, or would you like: Right now, the issue with Norsca vs Chaos is that there is pretty much no practical reason to refuse Chaos.